Qualified professionals
CPAs, attorneys and engineers keep responsibility for determinations within their disciplines.
The evidence standard
Incentive Tower connects every preliminary conclusion to the facts, documents and source material behind it, so your team can check the reasoning rather than trust it.
From project to finding
Material findings show their supporting evidence and review state.
Location, applicant, scope, equipment, cost and timing.
Proposals, specifications, invoices and ownership records.
The conditions a supported program actually sets.
The rules and guidance a requirement comes from.
A preliminary view you can trace and challenge.
Five preliminary states
A preliminary match is never a government eligibility determination.
Current evidence supports several relevant preliminary requirements. Remaining requirements still need review.
The opportunity may be relevant, subject to further project facts and evidence.
A material fact or document is missing.
A tax, legal or technical question requires the appropriate accountable professional.
The current record does not support pursuing the opportunity on that basis.
Accountability stays explicit
Incentive Tower supports the process. It does not replace the people and authorities responsible for the outcome.
CPAs, attorneys and engineers keep responsibility for determinations within their disciplines.
Agencies and other administrators decide eligibility, approval and award under their own rules.
Applicants confirm project facts, approve materials and authorize submissions.
Before your next incentive application deadline
Bring one live project or incentive application. Leave with a clear brief, the questions that matter and a defined next step.